Assessment Criteria
|
What
went well
|
What did
not go quite so well
|
Shooting material appropriate to the task set;
|
The film was
conveyed to be a thriller opening by the use of the darker lighting, close
ups and the narrative in the police interview scene. Using restricted
narration makes the audience wonder what is going to happen which you would
expect from a crime thriller.
|
The lighting in
the last scene is quite a lot darker than the rest of our film and is much
harder to see and understand what is happening. Due to editing our lighting
to make it lighter our shots become much grainier.
|
Controlled
use of the camera
|
The use of hand
held camera in the last scenes conveys thriller as well as using the tripod
in the interviewing scene to convey the seriousness of the situation.
|
Using tracking
shots during the last scenes would have added to the pace and suspense,
furthering the idea of the thriller genre.
|
Attention
to framing
|
Framing in the
interview scene is used to show the whole picture without spaces to the sides
of the shot.
|
During the end
scene our framing doesn’t capture Mr Harvey dragging his daughter as the
framing is very inconsistent and darker.
|
Variety of
shot sizes
|
A variety of
shot sizes were used to convey the characters thoughts and expressions
through their facial expression and body language.
|
Need more use of
close ups to portray emotion even further towards the audience to convey
sympathy towards our protagonist.
|
Close
attention to mise en scene
|
Mis en scene was
portrayed through the characters clothing (school clothing) and make-up was
used to show bruising. We showed Mr Robinson to be someone of importance by
having him wear a suit. The idea of the killing being in woods rather than in
a home adds to the thriller genre.
|
Mr Harvey’s
clothing wasn’t easily recognised due to the lighting and him sitting down.
The lighting in the scenes made it much harder to understand what was
happening and who was who which would have been improved by re-filming at an
earlier time or using lights and colours to use upon the characters.
|
Editing so
that meaning is apparent to the viewer
|
The opening was
able to flow with the use of jump cut shots to create mystery. We were able
to use continuity within our shots so that our piece flowed.
|
Meaning wasn’t
apparent at all times due to the lighting making understanding much harder to
the audience.
|
Making
selective and appropriate use of shot transitions, captions and other effects
|
The use of cuts
between shots rather than fades or wipes matches in more with the thriller
genre. The effects and transitions were put in to the opening correctly
without just being thrown in because they needed to and were used to convey
the thriller genre even more.
|
Using small
captions in the corner for our title made it harder to spot and didn’t match
in quite as much with the thriller genre. The title should have been more
appealing and bring it to the audience’s attention so it’s a film title
they’d remember.
|
Recording
and editing sound with images appropriately.
|
We used foleys
to create a louder sound of footsteps as well as a variety of sound effects
i.e. birds. We also made sure that it was easier to hear our narrative with
no music playing over it.
|
There are places
of silence where the camera has been cut for the use of continuity purposes.
The contrapuntal music may bring confusion to the audience due to the
thriller genre on screen. Dialogue can be hard to hear sometimes and could be
improved with the use of microphones and voice overs.
|
Thursday, 12 June 2014
Moving onto the advanced portfolio-Evaluation of AS thriller opening- Megan
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Well done Megan! Good evaluative work, and on time :)
ReplyDelete